<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 510 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the assessee, determining that the receipts from the transfer of development rights constituted capital gains and qualified for exemptions under sections 54 and 54EC of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the nature of the built-up area received was dismissed as the Tribunal found the issue debatable and not a mistake apparent from the record. The attempt to restrict the exemption to one unit was rejected, affirming the original ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 510 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the assessee, determining that the receipts from the transfer of development rights constituted capital gains and qualified for exemptions under sections 54 and 54EC of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the nature of the built-up area received was dismissed as the Tribunal found the issue debatable and not a mistake apparent from the record. The attempt to restrict the exemption to one unit was rejected, affirming the original ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>