<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 431 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205594</link>
    <description>Where an issue had already been conceded before the Tribunal and had attained finality after dismissal of the revenue&#039;s earlier appeal, the revenue could not reopen the same question by asserting factual differences. The principle applied was finality of adjudication: a concluded issue cannot be re-agitated on the same dispute once the earlier decision has become final. The issue was therefore answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 431 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205594</link>
      <description>Where an issue had already been conceded before the Tribunal and had attained finality after dismissal of the revenue&#039;s earlier appeal, the revenue could not reopen the same question by asserting factual differences. The principle applied was finality of adjudication: a concluded issue cannot be re-agitated on the same dispute once the earlier decision has become final. The issue was therefore answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>