<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 715 - Jharkhand High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205582</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Income-tax Department&#039;s appeals regarding the assessment of income-tax on remittances under a technical collaboration agreement. The court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, stating no income-tax was payable on the remittances. It held that income-tax paid under the collaboration agreement was part of the lump sum consideration for acquiring know-how, eligible for deduction under section 35AB. The reversal of Assessing Officer&#039;s orders by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) impacted deductions claimed by the assessee, and prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a)(ii) were deemed impermissible for debatable claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 715 - Jharkhand High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205582</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Income-tax Department&#039;s appeals regarding the assessment of income-tax on remittances under a technical collaboration agreement. The court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, stating no income-tax was payable on the remittances. It held that income-tax paid under the collaboration agreement was part of the lump sum consideration for acquiring know-how, eligible for deduction under section 35AB. The reversal of Assessing Officer&#039;s orders by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) impacted deductions claimed by the assessee, and prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a)(ii) were deemed impermissible for debatable claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>