<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 240 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 75,00,000 within eight weeks while waiving the balance pre-deposit requirement and staying recovery until the appeal&#039;s final decision. The judgment emphasized the need for evidence to support claims of including courier charges in the assessable value and highlighted the importance of adhering to the legal interpretations and circulars governing Cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 240 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 75,00,000 within eight weeks while waiving the balance pre-deposit requirement and staying recovery until the appeal&#039;s final decision. The judgment emphasized the need for evidence to support claims of including courier charges in the assessable value and highlighted the importance of adhering to the legal interpretations and circulars governing Cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>