<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 791 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205573</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the fee to be paid on appeals. The Tribunal found that the Registry had erred in requesting additional fees based on duty refunds claimed by the appellant. Referring to the relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act, the Tribunal determined that the standard fee of Rs. 1,000/- was sufficient for each appeal as they did not involve duty demands or penalties but were related to refund claim rejections. This decision clarified the correct fee structure for appeals, preventing the appellant from being unfairly charged additional fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 791 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205573</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the fee to be paid on appeals. The Tribunal found that the Registry had erred in requesting additional fees based on duty refunds claimed by the appellant. Referring to the relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act, the Tribunal determined that the standard fee of Rs. 1,000/- was sufficient for each appeal as they did not involve duty demands or penalties but were related to refund claim rejections. This decision clarified the correct fee structure for appeals, preventing the appellant from being unfairly charged additional fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>