<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 705 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the restoration of appeal Nos. E/3407 &amp;amp; 3408 of 2004, emphasizing the repeated adjournments due to the non-appearance of the respondents&#039; advocate. The Tribunal rejected the adjournment application, highlighting the lack of valid justification and supporting medical evidence for the advocate&#039;s alleged illness. It upheld the principles of natural justice, stating that seeking adjournments without proper cause is not an absolute right. The Tribunal found no abuse of process in its decision and dismissed the applications for recalling the order, stressing the importance of timely proceedings and the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 705 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the restoration of appeal Nos. E/3407 &amp;amp; 3408 of 2004, emphasizing the repeated adjournments due to the non-appearance of the respondents&#039; advocate. The Tribunal rejected the adjournment application, highlighting the lack of valid justification and supporting medical evidence for the advocate&#039;s alleged illness. It upheld the principles of natural justice, stating that seeking adjournments without proper cause is not an absolute right. The Tribunal found no abuse of process in its decision and dismissed the applications for recalling the order, stressing the importance of timely proceedings and the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>