https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205543 An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was held not maintainable where the dispute concerned the rate of excise duty, because such questions fall outside High Court appellate jurisdiction and within the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Section 35L. The court therefore dismissed the appeal for want of maintainability and left the appellant to pursue the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205543 An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was held not maintainable where the dispute concerned the rate of excise duty, because such questions fall outside High Court appellate jurisdiction and within the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Section 35L. The court therefore dismissed the appeal for want of maintainability and left the appellant to pursue the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205543