<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 363 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205536</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue in a case challenging the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2001-02. It held that the Assessing Officer must explicitly record positive and categorical satisfaction in the assessment order to invoke penalty jurisdiction. Without such explicit satisfaction, the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid. The Court set aside the previous order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in line with the legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 363 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205536</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue in a case challenging the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2001-02. It held that the Assessing Officer must explicitly record positive and categorical satisfaction in the assessment order to invoke penalty jurisdiction. Without such explicit satisfaction, the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid. The Court set aside the previous order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in line with the legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>