<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 505 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205530</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue against the penalty imposition under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi due to delay and lack of valid reasons. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and cross objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 505 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205530</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue against the penalty imposition under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi due to delay and lack of valid reasons. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and cross objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>