<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 501 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205521</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit was waived pending appeal in a dispute involving an SEZ developer, as the tribunal took a prima facie view that the legislative scheme and revenue clarification treated SEZ developers at par for the relevant customs procedure. Interim protection was granted to avoid hardship, and the effect of the revenue&#039;s reliance on later circulars, a notification and the Rule 6 amendment was left open for consideration at the regular hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 501 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205521</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit was waived pending appeal in a dispute involving an SEZ developer, as the tribunal took a prima facie view that the legislative scheme and revenue clarification treated SEZ developers at par for the relevant customs procedure. Interim protection was granted to avoid hardship, and the effect of the revenue&#039;s reliance on later circulars, a notification and the Rule 6 amendment was left open for consideration at the regular hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>