<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 620 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205478</link>
    <description>The judge found in favor of the appellants regarding the insurance premium on company vehicles but deemed the credit for travel charges, factory garden maintenance, and plant housekeeping services irregularly availed. The appellants were instructed to pre-deposit the irregularly availed amount within four weeks to receive a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay of recovery for the penalty and the remaining duty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 620 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205478</link>
      <description>The judge found in favor of the appellants regarding the insurance premium on company vehicles but deemed the credit for travel charges, factory garden maintenance, and plant housekeeping services irregularly availed. The appellants were instructed to pre-deposit the irregularly availed amount within four weeks to receive a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay of recovery for the penalty and the remaining duty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>