https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205475 The court held that the petitioner, a Custom House Agency, failed to establish sufficient cause for the reliefs sought in challenging the order requiring pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite claiming financial hardship, the petitioner did not provide substantial evidence to support this assertion. The court found that the petitioner did not present a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205475 The court held that the petitioner, a Custom House Agency, failed to establish sufficient cause for the reliefs sought in challenging the order requiring pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite claiming financial hardship, the petitioner did not provide substantial evidence to support this assertion. The court found that the petitioner did not present a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205475