<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 415 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205452</link>
    <description>Requested information on the movement of the proposal/file for appointment of the President of the CESTAT was claimed to be exempt under Section 8(1)(i) of the Right to Information Act. The Commission noted that the appointment had already been completed, so the asserted basis for withholding the file movement details no longer applied. The exemption claim was rejected and the CPIO was directed to disclose the requested information within 10 working days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 415 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205452</link>
      <description>Requested information on the movement of the proposal/file for appointment of the President of the CESTAT was claimed to be exempt under Section 8(1)(i) of the Right to Information Act. The Commission noted that the appointment had already been completed, so the asserted basis for withholding the file movement details no longer applied. The exemption claim was rejected and the CPIO was directed to disclose the requested information within 10 working days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>