https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205450 The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with pre-deposit directions in appeals, highlighting instances where non-compliance led to dismissal. It also addressed a request for an extension of time for making a balance deposit, granting the extension based on financial constraints. The rejection of a modification application due to lack of evidence supporting financial hardships and reliance on inapplicable judgments was noted. The judgment underscored the need for substantiated claims of financial hardships and limitations on relying on judgments for equitable reliefs. It serves as a reminder of procedural requirements and evidentiary standards in pre-deposit matters before the Tribunal. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205450 The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with pre-deposit directions in appeals, highlighting instances where non-compliance led to dismissal. It also addressed a request for an extension of time for making a balance deposit, granting the extension based on financial constraints. The rejection of a modification application due to lack of evidence supporting financial hardships and reliance on inapplicable judgments was noted. The judgment underscored the need for substantiated claims of financial hardships and limitations on relying on judgments for equitable reliefs. It serves as a reminder of procedural requirements and evidentiary standards in pre-deposit matters before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205450