<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 104 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and denying the assessees&#039; claim for refund. The department was permitted to recover the amount of Rs.1,25,000/- already paid, and the balance was not eligible for refund. The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, rejecting the assessees&#039; challenge against the part of the refund sanctioned as CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 104 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and denying the assessees&#039; claim for refund. The department was permitted to recover the amount of Rs.1,25,000/- already paid, and the balance was not eligible for refund. The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, rejecting the assessees&#039; challenge against the part of the refund sanctioned as CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>