<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 410 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling that the educational institute&#039;s facilitation of campus recruitment programs did not qualify as a &quot;Manpower Recruitment Agency&quot; for service tax purposes. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument for invoking the extended period for demanding service tax, finding that the institute&#039;s actions did not amount to evasion warranting such an extended period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 410 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling that the educational institute&#039;s facilitation of campus recruitment programs did not qualify as a &quot;Manpower Recruitment Agency&quot; for service tax purposes. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument for invoking the extended period for demanding service tax, finding that the institute&#039;s actions did not amount to evasion warranting such an extended period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>