<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 617 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on the respondent for late service tax payment, considering the voluntary payment made before the penalty notice. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the respondent&#039;s timely payment justified penalty cancellation. However, the Court ruled that the Tribunal lacked authority to address the interest refund claim, stating interest is separate from penalties. The Court directed the respondent to follow statutory procedures to claim any excess interest paid. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s discussion on interest refund but upholding the penalty cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 617 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on the respondent for late service tax payment, considering the voluntary payment made before the penalty notice. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the respondent&#039;s timely payment justified penalty cancellation. However, the Court ruled that the Tribunal lacked authority to address the interest refund claim, stating interest is separate from penalties. The Court directed the respondent to follow statutory procedures to claim any excess interest paid. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s discussion on interest refund but upholding the penalty cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>