<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 480 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205418</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee, a Government-owned Corporation, was not liable for a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) as there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The court supported the ITAT&#039;s findings that the reduction in stock value was based on estimates and reports, not falsehood, and that the assessee had disclosed all material facts. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 480 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205418</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee, a Government-owned Corporation, was not liable for a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) as there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The court supported the ITAT&#039;s findings that the reduction in stock value was based on estimates and reports, not falsehood, and that the assessee had disclosed all material facts. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>