<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 581 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205416</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant deduction under section 80 HHC, delete disallowances for bad debts and excessive disallowance under section 14A, and follow tribunal rulings on prior period expenses, lease rentals, and expenditure on catalysts. The judgments were pronounced on 29.12.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 581 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205416</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant deduction under section 80 HHC, delete disallowances for bad debts and excessive disallowance under section 14A, and follow tribunal rulings on prior period expenses, lease rentals, and expenditure on catalysts. The judgments were pronounced on 29.12.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>