https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205409 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied input service credit on catering services. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in a similar case, establishing that the appellant was entitled to the credit under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The argument that the benefit would only apply if food was supplied free of cost to employees was rejected, and the Tribunal emphasized that the issue had already been settled by the High Court decision. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205409 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied input service credit on catering services. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in a similar case, establishing that the appellant was entitled to the credit under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The argument that the benefit would only apply if food was supplied free of cost to employees was rejected, and the Tribunal emphasized that the issue had already been settled by the High Court decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205409