<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 401 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief to the Appellant. It held that the professional fees for advisory services related to acquiring a company qualified as &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal emphasized a broad interpretation of &#039;input service&#039; to include services integral to manufacturing business, rejecting the restrictive view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal clarified that once credit is eligible, it can be utilized on any output services or final products without restriction to the specific product manufactured using the input service. The Tribunal also ruled that credit cannot be denied based on the location of invoice issuance and that the input service distributor provision is procedural.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 401 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief to the Appellant. It held that the professional fees for advisory services related to acquiring a company qualified as &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal emphasized a broad interpretation of &#039;input service&#039; to include services integral to manufacturing business, rejecting the restrictive view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal clarified that once credit is eligible, it can be utilized on any output services or final products without restriction to the specific product manufactured using the input service. The Tribunal also ruled that credit cannot be denied based on the location of invoice issuance and that the input service distributor provision is procedural.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>