<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 595 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of appeal as the appellant failed to comply with the Supreme Court&#039;s order to deposit Rs. 2.00 crores within a specified time frame. Despite making partial payments, the delay in the final payment of Rs. 1.00 crore was deemed unacceptable. The Tribunal emphasized that compliance with Supreme Court directives is mandatory, and any delays must be addressed directly with the Supreme Court. Non-compliance with the Supreme Court&#039;s order led to the dismissal of the restoration application, highlighting the importance of adhering to court directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 595 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of appeal as the appellant failed to comply with the Supreme Court&#039;s order to deposit Rs. 2.00 crores within a specified time frame. Despite making partial payments, the delay in the final payment of Rs. 1.00 crore was deemed unacceptable. The Tribunal emphasized that compliance with Supreme Court directives is mandatory, and any delays must be addressed directly with the Supreme Court. Non-compliance with the Supreme Court&#039;s order led to the dismissal of the restoration application, highlighting the importance of adhering to court directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>