https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205400 The appeal was made against the denial of permission for recasting of RG23A Part II and PLA. The presiding Judge expressed disappointment at the unavailability of D.R.s, emphasizing the importance of timely case disposal due to government revenue implications. The Judge directed cases to be adjourned as per counsels' convenience and scheduled the matter for a later date. The Registry was instructed to send a copy of the order to relevant authorities for necessary action, highlighting the court's commitment to addressing delays and ensuring fair proceedings. en-us Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205400 The appeal was made against the denial of permission for recasting of RG23A Part II and PLA. The presiding Judge expressed disappointment at the unavailability of D.R.s, emphasizing the importance of timely case disposal due to government revenue implications. The Judge directed cases to be adjourned as per counsels' convenience and scheduled the matter for a later date. The Registry was instructed to send a copy of the order to relevant authorities for necessary action, highlighting the court's commitment to addressing delays and ensuring fair proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205400