<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 215 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205395</link>
    <description>Section 260A appeals were maintainable because the substantial question of law regarding surplus and non-SLR investment income had been raised before the appellate authorities and considered by the Tribunal. For section 80P(2)(a)(i), interest earned by a cooperative bank on investments of surplus funds, including statutory reserves and non-SLR deposits, was held attributable to the business of banking. The Court treated the distinction between SLR and non-SLR investments as immaterial for this purpose and held that such interest formed part of banking profits. The revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 215 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205395</link>
      <description>Section 260A appeals were maintainable because the substantial question of law regarding surplus and non-SLR investment income had been raised before the appellate authorities and considered by the Tribunal. For section 80P(2)(a)(i), interest earned by a cooperative bank on investments of surplus funds, including statutory reserves and non-SLR deposits, was held attributable to the business of banking. The Court treated the distinction between SLR and non-SLR investments as immaterial for this purpose and held that such interest formed part of banking profits. The revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>