<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 211 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), allowing the clearance of final products in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The dispute centered on whether both actual exports and deemed exports should be considered for DTA clearances. The Tribunal ruled that the decision in the Amitex Silk Mills case applied, emphasizing that once a decision is made based on Tribunal reasoning, it becomes binding as law. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that payment in foreign exchange was a prerequisite, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to clear products in the DTA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 211 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), allowing the clearance of final products in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The dispute centered on whether both actual exports and deemed exports should be considered for DTA clearances. The Tribunal ruled that the decision in the Amitex Silk Mills case applied, emphasizing that once a decision is made based on Tribunal reasoning, it becomes binding as law. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that payment in foreign exchange was a prerequisite, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to clear products in the DTA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>