<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 388 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205370</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on payments made to holding companies was allowed for statistical purposes. The Appellate Tribunal remanded the issue back to the assessing officer to verify if the payments were indeed reimbursement of expenses related to deputed personnel, based on the evidence submitted during the assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 388 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205370</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on payments made to holding companies was allowed for statistical purposes. The Appellate Tribunal remanded the issue back to the assessing officer to verify if the payments were indeed reimbursement of expenses related to deputed personnel, based on the evidence submitted during the assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>