<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 596 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the application, granting a stay on the demand amount for the period before August 2004 until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The decision was based on the consideration of facts, including the appellant&#039;s payment of Service Tax post-inclusion of loading and unloading charges, and the lack of justification for invoking the extended period of limitation for the subsequent period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 596 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the application, granting a stay on the demand amount for the period before August 2004 until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The decision was based on the consideration of facts, including the appellant&#039;s payment of Service Tax post-inclusion of loading and unloading charges, and the lack of justification for invoking the extended period of limitation for the subsequent period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>