<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 676 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of penalties concerning the difference in deductions under sections 80HH and 80I. However, the penalty related to royalty disallowance was upheld, with instructions to re-calculate the penalty considering higher deductions. The decision was rendered on 30th September 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 676 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of penalties concerning the difference in deductions under sections 80HH and 80I. However, the penalty related to royalty disallowance was upheld, with instructions to re-calculate the penalty considering higher deductions. The decision was rendered on 30th September 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>