<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 320 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205335</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that the appellant-bank was liable to pay service tax for the period from April 2002 to April 2006 under &quot;Banking and other Financial Services&quot; for charges collected from credit card-holders using cards abroad. The profit margin collected by the bank from credit card holders abroad was considered as part of the value of &quot;credit card service&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s argument that the profit margin should not be included was rejected, and they were directed to pre-deposit the remaining amount of Rs.74 lakhs within four weeks to avoid penalty enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 320 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205335</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that the appellant-bank was liable to pay service tax for the period from April 2002 to April 2006 under &quot;Banking and other Financial Services&quot; for charges collected from credit card-holders using cards abroad. The profit margin collected by the bank from credit card holders abroad was considered as part of the value of &quot;credit card service&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s argument that the profit margin should not be included was rejected, and they were directed to pre-deposit the remaining amount of Rs.74 lakhs within four weeks to avoid penalty enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>