<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 609 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205332</link>
    <description>Refusal to condone delay and dismissal of an appeal for non-prosecution were set aside where the writ court considered that one further opportunity should be granted despite the petitioner&#039;s repeated absence. The High Court disapproved of the conduct noted by the Appellate Tribunal, but directed that the delay-condonation application be reconsidered afresh rather than finally rejected on that occasion. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the application and the appeal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 609 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205332</link>
      <description>Refusal to condone delay and dismissal of an appeal for non-prosecution were set aside where the writ court considered that one further opportunity should be granted despite the petitioner&#039;s repeated absence. The High Court disapproved of the conduct noted by the Appellate Tribunal, but directed that the delay-condonation application be reconsidered afresh rather than finally rejected on that occasion. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the application and the appeal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>