<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 461 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that service tax liability on the recipient of services provided from abroad arises only from 18-4-2006, setting aside the liability imposed for the period from 9-7-2004 to 31-3-2006. The judgment emphasized the impact of section 66A, clarifying the conditions for taxing services received from overseas. The order, based on High Court precedents, upheld the decision, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 461 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that service tax liability on the recipient of services provided from abroad arises only from 18-4-2006, setting aside the liability imposed for the period from 9-7-2004 to 31-3-2006. The judgment emphasized the impact of section 66A, clarifying the conditions for taxing services received from overseas. The order, based on High Court precedents, upheld the decision, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>