<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 199 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205291</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by granting full deduction under section 80-IB(10) for the entire project, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal held that each residential unit, as per the approved building plan and less than 1,000 sq.ft., should be considered independently. The legislative amendment restricting multiple sales to family members was prospective and did not apply to the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 199 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205291</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by granting full deduction under section 80-IB(10) for the entire project, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal held that each residential unit, as per the approved building plan and less than 1,000 sq.ft., should be considered independently. The legislative amendment restricting multiple sales to family members was prospective and did not apply to the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>