<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit concerning service tax liabilities for &#039;Renting of Immovable Property&#039; and &#039;Management, Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Services&#039;. The Tribunal noted that the appellant&#039;s leasing of vacant land for storage and warehousing did not fall under &#039;Renting of Immovable Property Services&#039; as per Budget 2007-2008 and relevant clarifications. Additionally, the operation and maintenance of a mud plant were not considered &#039;Management, Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Services&#039;. As a result, the waiver application was granted, and recovery of the amounts was halted pending appeal resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit concerning service tax liabilities for &#039;Renting of Immovable Property&#039; and &#039;Management, Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Services&#039;. The Tribunal noted that the appellant&#039;s leasing of vacant land for storage and warehousing did not fall under &#039;Renting of Immovable Property Services&#039; as per Budget 2007-2008 and relevant clarifications. Additionally, the operation and maintenance of a mud plant were not considered &#039;Management, Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Services&#039;. As a result, the waiver application was granted, and recovery of the amounts was halted pending appeal resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>