<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 532 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the Ld. CIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2006-07, allowing certain expenses previously disallowed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for errors prejudicial to revenue to exercise jurisdiction. The A.O. was directed to treat the order as set aside for specific items, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed on 31.12.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 532 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the Ld. CIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2006-07, allowing certain expenses previously disallowed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for errors prejudicial to revenue to exercise jurisdiction. The A.O. was directed to treat the order as set aside for specific items, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed on 31.12.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>