<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 174 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205195</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the impugned order, disposing of the appeals on merit. Despite acknowledging misdeclarations in the consignment, a lenient view was taken, resulting in a reduction of the redemption fine and penalties imposed. The fines and penalties were modified significantly based on the circumstances of the case. One individual&#039;s penalty was set aside, allowing the appellants to retrieve the goods upon payment of the revised fines and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 174 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205195</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the impugned order, disposing of the appeals on merit. Despite acknowledging misdeclarations in the consignment, a lenient view was taken, resulting in a reduction of the redemption fine and penalties imposed. The fines and penalties were modified significantly based on the circumstances of the case. One individual&#039;s penalty was set aside, allowing the appellants to retrieve the goods upon payment of the revised fines and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>