https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205192 The case involved issues of denial of credit due to incorrect and fake invoices, alleged violation of record-keeping rules, invocation of extended limitation period, and lack of proper verification by Revenue. The appellants argued for their compliance with rules and lack of intent to evade tax. The court found that proper verification was lacking and remanded the case for a comprehensive review, allowing the appellants to present their case and citing relevant Supreme Court judgments. The appeal was disposed of through remand, and the stay petition was resolved accordingly. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205192 The case involved issues of denial of credit due to incorrect and fake invoices, alleged violation of record-keeping rules, invocation of extended limitation period, and lack of proper verification by Revenue. The appellants argued for their compliance with rules and lack of intent to evade tax. The court found that proper verification was lacking and remanded the case for a comprehensive review, allowing the appellants to present their case and citing relevant Supreme Court judgments. The appeal was disposed of through remand, and the stay petition was resolved accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205192