<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205188</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to inadequate consideration of the appellants&#039; contentions in the initial order. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to address all raised points in the written submissions. The Appellate Tribunal was directed to focus solely on the issue of calculation during the reconsideration process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205188</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to inadequate consideration of the appellants&#039; contentions in the initial order. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to address all raised points in the written submissions. The Appellate Tribunal was directed to focus solely on the issue of calculation during the reconsideration process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>