https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205171 The appeal was rejected as the appellant, a chartered accountant, failed to pay service tax on reimbursement charges and services provided to call centers. The appellant's argument to invoke Section 80 of the Finance Act was dismissed due to lack of evidence and delayed action despite being aware of tax provisions. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were upheld based on the appellant's failure to include certain amounts from customers and not paying tax on specific sums. The judgment was delivered on 8-11-2010 by Member (J) Archana Wadhwa. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 May 2011 16:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205171 The appeal was rejected as the appellant, a chartered accountant, failed to pay service tax on reimbursement charges and services provided to call centers. The appellant's argument to invoke Section 80 of the Finance Act was dismissed due to lack of evidence and delayed action despite being aware of tax provisions. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were upheld based on the appellant's failure to include certain amounts from customers and not paying tax on specific sums. The judgment was delivered on 8-11-2010 by Member (J) Archana Wadhwa. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205171