<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 522 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205167</link>
    <description>A customs house agent licence held in the name of a deceased proprietor was sought to be continued by the applicant after his death. Continuation was refused because the applicant did not satisfy the prescribed educational qualification and examination requirements under the applicable regulations, and those eligibility conditions applied even where the business was proposed to be carried on through a private limited company. The existing licence was also valid only up to 2005, reinforcing the refusal to validate the business licence in the applicant&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 522 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205167</link>
      <description>A customs house agent licence held in the name of a deceased proprietor was sought to be continued by the applicant after his death. Continuation was refused because the applicant did not satisfy the prescribed educational qualification and examination requirements under the applicable regulations, and those eligibility conditions applied even where the business was proposed to be carried on through a private limited company. The existing licence was also valid only up to 2005, reinforcing the refusal to validate the business licence in the applicant&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>