<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 171 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants to claim input service credit for manufacturing goods cleared without duty payment to the principal manufacturer, who used them in producing final products cleared with duty. The decision aligned with a precedent set by the Tribunal&#039;s Larger Bench, enabling the appellants to avail CENVAT credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 171 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants to claim input service credit for manufacturing goods cleared without duty payment to the principal manufacturer, who used them in producing final products cleared with duty. The decision aligned with a precedent set by the Tribunal&#039;s Larger Bench, enabling the appellants to avail CENVAT credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>