<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 252 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the significance of challenging final assessments through the appellate process and rejecting the appellant&#039;s stance on the non-appealability of the assessed bills of entry. The judgment highlighted the importance of following legal procedures and availing appellate remedies to address grievances arising from final assessments and differential duty demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 252 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the significance of challenging final assessments through the appellate process and rejecting the appellant&#039;s stance on the non-appealability of the assessed bills of entry. The judgment highlighted the importance of following legal procedures and availing appellate remedies to address grievances arising from final assessments and differential duty demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>