<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 341 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205137</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to reduce duty liability from Rs. 11,77,971 to Rs. 8,50,079 in remand proceedings. The Court ruled that the remand was limited to the confirmed duty amount of Rs. 8,50,079, and the assessing officer could not demand an amount exceeding that. As the Revenue did not appeal the original order confirming the lower duty amount, the remand was specifically for that sum only. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument and affirmed the CESTAT&#039;s decision, finding no error in it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 341 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205137</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to reduce duty liability from Rs. 11,77,971 to Rs. 8,50,079 in remand proceedings. The Court ruled that the remand was limited to the confirmed duty amount of Rs. 8,50,079, and the assessing officer could not demand an amount exceeding that. As the Revenue did not appeal the original order confirming the lower duty amount, the remand was specifically for that sum only. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument and affirmed the CESTAT&#039;s decision, finding no error in it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>