https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205125 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the legality of the warrant issued under section 132A of the Income-tax Act. It held that the assets seized were undisclosed, the competent authority had applied its mind, and the seizure was justified under the law. The court found no fault with the Income-tax Department's actions, rejected arguments on fundamental rights violation and jurisdiction, and concluded that the petitioner failed in their case. No costs were awarded. en-us Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205125 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the legality of the warrant issued under section 132A of the Income-tax Act. It held that the assets seized were undisclosed, the competent authority had applied its mind, and the seizure was justified under the law. The court found no fault with the Income-tax Department's actions, rejected arguments on fundamental rights violation and jurisdiction, and concluded that the petitioner failed in their case. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205125