<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 543 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205123</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals partly, holding that both assessees were entitled to claim deduction under s. 54F of the IT Act. The issue of s. 50C assessment was dismissed as academic due to lack of adjudication by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the assessees complied with the statutory provisions, investing the sale proceeds in the new property within the prescribed timeline, and fulfilled the conditions of s. 54F.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 543 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205123</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals partly, holding that both assessees were entitled to claim deduction under s. 54F of the IT Act. The issue of s. 50C assessment was dismissed as academic due to lack of adjudication by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the assessees complied with the statutory provisions, investing the sale proceeds in the new property within the prescribed timeline, and fulfilled the conditions of s. 54F.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>