<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 540 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for restoration of appeals due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, lack of specific details regarding the cause of delay, and the overall lack of interest displayed by the applicants in pursuing the matter. Compliance with directions after the appeals were disposed of was not considered a sufficient ground for restoration, as the interim order ceased to exist once the appeals were finalized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 540 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for restoration of appeals due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, lack of specific details regarding the cause of delay, and the overall lack of interest displayed by the applicants in pursuing the matter. Compliance with directions after the appeals were disposed of was not considered a sufficient ground for restoration, as the interim order ceased to exist once the appeals were finalized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>