<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 282 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s failure to record cash payments of rent and subsequent filing of revised returns were not voluntary. The addition under section 69C was deemed justified, and the deemed income under section 69C was not eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s ruling and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 282 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s failure to record cash payments of rent and subsequent filing of revised returns were not voluntary. The addition under section 69C was deemed justified, and the deemed income under section 69C was not eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s ruling and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>