<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals on all grounds, treating the disputed expenses as revenue in nature and allowable under Section 37(1). The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s directions regarding the deduction under Section 80IA were upheld. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on a consistent interpretation of the nature of expenses and the applicable legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals on all grounds, treating the disputed expenses as revenue in nature and allowable under Section 37(1). The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s directions regarding the deduction under Section 80IA were upheld. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on a consistent interpretation of the nature of expenses and the applicable legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>