<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 527 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205071</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) cannot remit a refund matter for fresh verification after holding the original rejection unsustainable. Where the appellate authority finds that refund claims, including those relating to CHA services and sales commission, were not correctly rejected, it must decide the matter on merits itself and cannot leave further adjudication to the original authority. The order was therefore unsustainable to the extent it sent the matter back for verification, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was required to determine the refund claim afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 527 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205071</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) cannot remit a refund matter for fresh verification after holding the original rejection unsustainable. Where the appellate authority finds that refund claims, including those relating to CHA services and sales commission, were not correctly rejected, it must decide the matter on merits itself and cannot leave further adjudication to the original authority. The order was therefore unsustainable to the extent it sent the matter back for verification, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was required to determine the refund claim afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>