<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 140 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205070</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision in a case involving misdeclaration of goods and wrongful claims for duty concessions. Importers failed to substantiate their entitlement to benefits under relevant notifications, with investigations revealing discrepancies in test certificates and mean fiber diameters of imported wool. The authenticity of certificates was confirmed as forged, leading to confiscation, duty demands, and penalties. Despite the importers&#039; appeals and lack of substantial evidence, the tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing the importers&#039; burden of proof and rejecting the appeal based on fraudulent practices and lack of credibility in their claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 140 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205070</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision in a case involving misdeclaration of goods and wrongful claims for duty concessions. Importers failed to substantiate their entitlement to benefits under relevant notifications, with investigations revealing discrepancies in test certificates and mean fiber diameters of imported wool. The authenticity of certificates was confirmed as forged, leading to confiscation, duty demands, and penalties. Despite the importers&#039; appeals and lack of substantial evidence, the tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing the importers&#039; burden of proof and rejecting the appeal based on fraudulent practices and lack of credibility in their claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>