<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 281 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205069</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld CESTAT&#039;s decision directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 24 lacs out of a total demand of Rs. 79 lacs due to substantial evidence of misdeclaration and under valuation of imported goods. The director&#039;s unretracted confessional statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act supported the findings. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and they were granted time to make the pre-deposit within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 281 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205069</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld CESTAT&#039;s decision directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 24 lacs out of a total demand of Rs. 79 lacs due to substantial evidence of misdeclaration and under valuation of imported goods. The director&#039;s unretracted confessional statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act supported the findings. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and they were granted time to make the pre-deposit within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>